From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. Griffith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2016
No. 1:16-cv-01437-DAD-JLT (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2016)

Opinion

No. 1:16-cv-01437-DAD-JLT

10-26-2016

GEORGE PHILIP DRAKE, trustee of the GEORGE PHILIP DRAKE REVOCABLE TRUST, Plaintiff, v. RONALD W. GRIFFITH and DEBORA C. GRIFFITH, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REMANDING THE MATTER TO KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAPERIS AS MOOT

(Doc. No. 7)

Ronald and Debora Griffith seek removal of an unlawful detainer action filed in the Kern County Superior Court, Case No. MCL-16-000378. (See Doc. No. 1.) Because an action for unlawful detainer arises under state law and defenses raised in the answer do not invoke federal jurisdiction, the assigned magistrate judge determined that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action. (Doc. No. 7.) Accordingly, the magistrate judge recommended the matter be remanded to Kern County Superior Court, and the pending motions to proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot. (Id. at 4.)

The parties were given fourteen days to file any objections to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations. (Id.) To date, no objections have been filed to those findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this court conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly,

1. The September 28, 2016 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 7) are adopted in full;

2. This action is remanded forthwith to the Kern County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;

3. Defendants' motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. Nos. 4, 5) are denied as moot; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26 , 2016

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Drake v. Griffith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2016
No. 1:16-cv-01437-DAD-JLT (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Drake v. Griffith

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE PHILIP DRAKE, trustee of the GEORGE PHILIP DRAKE REVOCABLE TRUST…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 26, 2016

Citations

No. 1:16-cv-01437-DAD-JLT (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2016)