From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D.R. Sellers v. Small Business Administration

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 25, 1969
407 F.2d 402 (5th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 26420.

February 25, 1969.

O. Joseph Damiani, Houston, Tex., for appellant.

Anthony J.P. Farris, Morton L. Susman, U.S. Attys., James R. Gough, Joel P. Kay, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.


In this case, the Referee in Bankruptcy denied a discharge to the appellant, D.R. Sellers. Upon review the District Court affirmed, In re Sellers, 295 F. Supp. 1354. Upon consideration of the appeal, we find no error in the action taken by the District Court, and we affirm on the basis of its published opinion.

Having studied the briefs and records, we have determined that this appeal is appropriate for summary disposition without argument. Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit the Clerk of this Court has been directed to put this case on the summary calendar and notify the parties in writing. See for example Gamez v. Beto, January 30, 1969 [ 406 F.2d 1000].

Affirmed.


Summaries of

D.R. Sellers v. Small Business Administration

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 25, 1969
407 F.2d 402 (5th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

D.R. Sellers v. Small Business Administration

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of D.R. SELLERS, Bankrupt, Appellant, v. SMALL BUSINESS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 25, 1969

Citations

407 F.2d 402 (5th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

United States v. Sellers

Shortly before this assignment, appellant Dunham Sellers filed for a petition in bankruptcy, which was…

McCarty v. Small Business Administration

In a very similar case, this Court upheld the actions of a district court "on the basis of its [the district…