From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dozier v. Mai

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 9, 2023
1:23-cv-00759-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00759-JLT-SAB

08-09-2023

LEE DOZIER, Plaintiff, v. CHI MAI, et al., Defendants.


DEADLINE: AUGUST 15, 2023

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

SERVICE DOCUMENTS OR MOTION FOR

EXTENSION, AND CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Plaintiff filed this action on May 16, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) A scheduling conference is currently set for August 24, 2023. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has not returned service documents and the Defendants have not appeared.

Rule 4(m) provides that “If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court-on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff-must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). “But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” Id. The order setting the scheduling conference in this matter additionally provides that: “plaintiff shall diligently pursue service of the summons and complaint and dismiss those defendants against whom the plaintiff will not pursue claims . . .[and] plaintiff shall promptly file proofs of service of the summons and complaint so the Court has a record of service.” (ECF No. 3 at 1.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. On or before August 15, 2023, Plaintiff shall file executed summonses or a motion to extend the service date of service on the Defendants;

2. The scheduling conference set for August 24, 2023, is continued to September 27, 2023, at 11:30 a.m.;

3. The parties shall file a joint scheduling report seven (7) days prior to the scheduling conference; and

4. Plaintiff is further advised that failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation of dismissal pursuant to Rule 4, and the issuance of sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dozier v. Mai

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 9, 2023
1:23-cv-00759-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Dozier v. Mai

Case Details

Full title:LEE DOZIER, Plaintiff, v. CHI MAI, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 9, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00759-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2023)