From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downing v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Nov 18, 2011
373 P.3d 910 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 58658.

11-18-2011

Curtis Lundy DOWNING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Curtis Lundy Downing Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Curtis Lundy Downing

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus . Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; James M. Bixler, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See

In his petition filed on March 14, 2011, appellant challenged prison disciplinary proceedings that resulted in his placement in disciplinary segregation. Notably, appellant neither alleged nor demonstrated that any credits were forfeited. Appellant's claims challenged the conditions of confinement, and thus, were not cognizable in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in state court. Bowen v. Warden, 100 Nev. 489, 490, 686 P.2d 250, 250 (1984) ; see also Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 484, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).


Summaries of

Downing v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Nov 18, 2011
373 P.3d 910 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Downing v. State

Case Details

Full title:Curtis Lundy DOWNING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Nov 18, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 910 (Nev. 2011)