From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downey v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 17, 2019
No. 19-1803 (4th Cir. Oct. 17, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-1803

10-17-2019

MARK DOWNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendant - Appellee.

Mark Downey, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:19-cv-01872-PX) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Downey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark Downey appeals the district court's order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Downey v. United States, No. 8:19-cv-01872-PX (D. Md. July 8, 2019). We deny Downey's motion for a nationwide public ruling to quash federal and state sovereign immunity. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Downey v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 17, 2019
No. 19-1803 (4th Cir. Oct. 17, 2019)
Case details for

Downey v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MARK DOWNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 17, 2019

Citations

No. 19-1803 (4th Cir. Oct. 17, 2019)

Citing Cases

Downey v. United States

Plaintiff has a recent history of bringing qui tam lawsuits under the False Claims Act and filing motions…