From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dover v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 2, 2009
CASE NO. 5:08 CV 2130 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 2, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:08 CV 2130.

July 2, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman. The Report and Recommendation (ECF # 12) is ADOPTED by this Court, and Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF # 1) is DENIED.

In April 2007, a jury found Petitioner guilty of one count of felonious assault with a firearm specification, one count of improperly handling a firearm while in a motor vehicle, and once count of child endangerment. Petitioner was sentenced to seven years incarceration for felonious assault and three years on the firearm specification, to be served consecutively. He was likewise sentenced to seventeen months incarceration for improperly handling the firearm while in a motor vehicle, to be served concurrently to his sentence for felonious assault. Petitioner was sentenced to 180 days of incarceration for child endangerment, again to be served concurrently to his sentence for felonious assault. Hence, Petitioner was sentenced to an aggregate term of incarceration for ten years.

Petitioner filed this motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on September 4, 2008, raising six grounds for relief.

Pursuant to Local Rule 72.2, this matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Perelman for the preparation of a report and recommendation. On March 16, 2009, Magistrate Judge Perelman recommended that this Court deny the Petition. Petitioner has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). The Court finds Magistrate Judge Perelman's Report and Recommendation to be well-written, well-supported, and correct. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation (ECF # 12) is ADOPTED in its entirety. Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence is DENIED.

Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dover v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 2, 2009
CASE NO. 5:08 CV 2130 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Dover v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution

Case Details

Full title:COURTNEY DOVER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, BELMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 2, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 5:08 CV 2130 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 2, 2009)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Sheldon

This court does not "substitute its determination of guilt for that of the factfinder and may not weigh the…

Shabazz v. Welch

Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). The court may not weigh the credibility of witnesses on habeas…