From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DOUP v. HURLEY

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 20, 2006
Case No. 2:04-cv-474 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 20, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:04-cv-474.

January 20, 2006


OPINION AND ORDER


On November 14, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Petitioner has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner objects to all of the Magistrate Judge's conclusions. He again raises all of the same arguments that were previously presented.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to by petitioner. For the reasons discussed in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court overrules petitioner's objections.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. This case is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

DOUP v. HURLEY

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 20, 2006
Case No. 2:04-cv-474 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 20, 2006)
Case details for

DOUP v. HURLEY

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY DOUP, Petitioner, v. PAT HURLEY, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 20, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:04-cv-474 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 20, 2006)