Douglas v. Ratliff

Full title: LAMONT O. DOUGLAS, et al. Plaintiffs v. ROBERT A. RATLIFF, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Oct 20, 2009

C-1-09-60 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 20, 2009)

Opinion

C-1-09-60.

October 20, 2009

ORDER

HERMAN WEBER, District Judge

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 37) to which neither party has objected.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 37) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Plaintiff Lamont Douglas's Motion to Supplement RICO claim (doc. no. 26) is DENIED and defendant's Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 25) is GRANTED. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED AND TERMINATED on the docket of this Court at plaintiff's cost.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit