From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. Kyle

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jan 19, 2012
NO. 01-10-00229-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 01-10-00229-CV

01-19-2012

RALPH O. DOUGLAS, Appellant v. KERMIT KYLE D/B/A KYLE'S PEST CONTROL, Appellee


On Appeal from the 11th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2003-24729


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant's brief in this case was originally due on December 26, 2011. Appellant failed to file his brief by that date. On January 3, 2012, the Clerk of this Court sent appellant a notice that his brief was past due and that his appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution without further notice if appellant failed to file, within a ten-day period, his appellant's brief and a motion for extension of time providing a reasonable explanation for his failure to timely file his appellant's brief. Appellant failed to file his appellant's brief within ten days from the notice of possible dismissal for want of prosecution. We dismiss this case for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (authorizing involuntary dismissal of civil case for want of prosecution). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.


Summaries of

Douglas v. Kyle

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jan 19, 2012
NO. 01-10-00229-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Douglas v. Kyle

Case Details

Full title:RALPH O. DOUGLAS, Appellant v. KERMIT KYLE D/B/A KYLE'S PEST CONTROL…

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

NO. 01-10-00229-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 19, 2012)

Citing Cases

Douglas v. Redmond

In our search for unsuccessful appeals and petitions for writs of mandamus, we uncovered the following saga:…