From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. Douglas

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 1, 2013
No. 63102 (Nev. Jul. 1, 2013)

Opinion

No. 63102

07-01-2013

ERIC T. DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. TAMMY DOUGLAS, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant seeks to challenge a district court order denying a motion for contempt. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged order, it is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). As we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

______________________, J.

Hardesty

______________________, J.

Parraguirre

______________________, J.

Cherry
cc: Hon. Bill Henderson, District Judge, Family Court Division

Eric Todd Douglas

Tammy Douglas

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Douglas v. Douglas

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 1, 2013
No. 63102 (Nev. Jul. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Douglas v. Douglas

Case Details

Full title:ERIC T. DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. TAMMY DOUGLAS, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 1, 2013

Citations

No. 63102 (Nev. Jul. 1, 2013)