From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dougherty v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1990
167 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 16, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County, Wager, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed in the exercise of discretion with costs and default judgment granted. Memorandum: After defendants' failure to answer plaintiff's summons and complaint, plaintiff's counsel notified defendants' counsel of the default and gave him an opportunity to serve an answer. Defendants failed to respond and plaintiff's attorney then moved for a default. The court gave defendants a second opportunity to avoid the consequences of their default by denying plaintiff's motion and vacating defendants' default upon the condition that defendants pay a minimum penalty of $250 within 20 days of service of the order. Defendants failed to comply with that conditional order. Plaintiff's attorney again moved for entry of a default judgment. In response, defendants failed to present in proper evidentiary form any reasonable excuse for the default or a meritorious defense (CPLR 3012 [d]). Absent such a showing, particularly under the facts of this case, Special Term abused its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for a default judgment (see, Egan v Federated Dept. Stores, 108 A.D.2d 718).


Summaries of

Dougherty v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1990
167 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Dougherty v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:DENIS DOUGHERTY, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

John G. Trautwein Fish Co., Inc. v. Gerland

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: It was an abuse of discretion…