From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dougfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 16, 1988
529 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1168.

August 16, 1988.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County; Richard J. Fowler, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.


The state concedes that a remand for resentencing within the guidelines is required where, as here, the trial court has failed to set forth reasons for deviating from the sentencing guidelines. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Dougfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 16, 1988
529 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Dougfield v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOD DOUGFIELD, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 16, 1988

Citations

529 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Rangel v. State

We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. Dougfield v. State, 529…

Hart v. Backstrom

Therefore, when an act or a section is revised or amended, the same must be complete within itself, so that…