From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dotson v. Workforce Essentials, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 23, 2012
No. 3-10-1099 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3-10-1099

10-23-2012

TONYA D. DOTSON v. WORKFORCE ESSENTIALS, INC; and TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT


ORDER

On October 19, 2012, the parties filed a joint notice of settlement of the plaintiff's claims against defendant Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development (Docket Entry No. 78).

As a result, the defendant's motion to compel and extend (Docket Entry No. 74) is rendered MOOT, and the Clerk is directed to terminate that motion as pending.

By October 29, 2012, the defendant shall file a notice of when it expects approval from the Tennessee Attorney General.

If the parties have already filed an agreed order or stipulation of dismissal of the plaintiff's claims against the defendant by October 29, 2012, there is no need for the defendant to file such a notice.

In their joint notice of settlement, the parties indicate that, assuming approval by the Attorney General, the parties will file the "appropriate motion to dismiss with prejudice." A motion to dismiss is not necessary. An agreed order or stipulation of dismissal is sufficient and appropriate.
--------

It is so ORDERED.

________

JULIET GRIFFIN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Dotson v. Workforce Essentials, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 23, 2012
No. 3-10-1099 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Dotson v. Workforce Essentials, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TONYA D. DOTSON v. WORKFORCE ESSENTIALS, INC; and TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

No. 3-10-1099 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 23, 2012)