From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dosskey v. Feather

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 17, 2014
No. 3:13-cv-02185-SU (D. Or. Jun. 17, 2014)

Opinion

No. 3:13-cv-02185-SU

06-17-2014

PHILLIP GORDON DOSSKEY, Petitioner, v. MARION FEATHER, Warden, Respondent.

Phillip Gordon Dosskey Pro Se Plaintiff Natalie K. Wight United States Attorney's Office Attorney for Defendant


ORDER

Phillip Gordon Dosskey

Pro Se Plaintiff Natalie K. Wight
United States Attorney's Office

Attorney for Defendant HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [18] on May 13, 2014, in which she recommends that the Court deny Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus [2]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation [18]. Accordingly, Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus [2] is denied with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dosskey v. Feather

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 17, 2014
No. 3:13-cv-02185-SU (D. Or. Jun. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Dosskey v. Feather

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP GORDON DOSSKEY, Petitioner, v. MARION FEATHER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 17, 2014

Citations

No. 3:13-cv-02185-SU (D. Or. Jun. 17, 2014)