From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorsey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 19, 2000
764 So. 2d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 98-1428

Opinion filed January 19, 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Cynthia G. Angelos, Judge; L.T. No. 97-870CAP.

Charles Leon Dorsey, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellees.


We treat this as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Doss v. Florida Department of Corrections, 730 So.2d 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), seeking review of the circuit court's denial of appellant/petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus. We deny the petition, finding no denial of due process and no departure from the essential requirements of the law in the circuit court's determination that the mandamus petition was untimely. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.100(c). This denial is without prejudice to petitioner asking the Secretary of the Department of Corrections to vacate and re-issue the challenged decision from which petitioner may then timely appeal. See Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dorsey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 19, 2000
764 So. 2d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Dorsey v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES LEON DORSEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA and MICHAEL W. MOORE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 19, 2000

Citations

764 So. 2d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Gundlah v. Moore

The appropriate remedy has been to dismiss the untimely appeal without prejudice, allowing the appellant to…