From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorsey v. Myers

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv763-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv763-MHT (WO)

11-30-2018

TIMOTHY RONALD DORSEY, Petitioner, v. WALTER MYERS, Warden, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) Petitioner's objections (doc. no. 29) are overruled.

(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 24) is adopted.

(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1) is denied.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 30th day of November, 2018.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dorsey v. Myers

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv763-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Dorsey v. Myers

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY RONALD DORSEY, Petitioner, v. WALTER MYERS, Warden, et al.…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv763-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2018)