From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorsey v. Loh

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 14, 2022
8:22-cv-00737-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2022)

Opinion

8:22-cv-00737-KES

07-14-2022

Gabriel Dorsey v. Bryan Loh, et al.


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Timely Serve Defendant

Plaintiff Gabriel Dorsey (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on March 31, 2022. (Dkt. 1.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) generally requires plaintiffs to serve defendants with process within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Although that 90-day deadline expired on June 29, 2022, Plaintiff has not filed any proof of service as of the date of this order.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before July 28, 2022, Plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve Defendant.


Summaries of

Dorsey v. Loh

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 14, 2022
8:22-cv-00737-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Dorsey v. Loh

Case Details

Full title:Gabriel Dorsey v. Bryan Loh, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 14, 2022

Citations

8:22-cv-00737-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2022)