From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorsey v. F H Assocs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 20, 2022
CV 21-8320-DMG (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-8320-DMG (Ex)

01-20-2022

Gabriel Dorsey v. F H Associates, LLC, et al.


Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States).

In the present case, it appears that these time periods have not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before January 28, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above.


Summaries of

Dorsey v. F H Assocs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 20, 2022
CV 21-8320-DMG (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Dorsey v. F H Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:Gabriel Dorsey v. F H Associates, LLC, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Citations

CV 21-8320-DMG (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2022)