From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorn v. Doe

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 5, 2021
4:20-CV-1492-KGB-BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 5, 2021)

Opinion

4:20-CV-1492-KGB-BD

03-05-2021

REMANDO DORN Reg #14300-010 PLAINTIFF v. DOE DEFENDANTS


RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

I. Procedures for Filing Objections

This Recommendation for dismissal has been sent to Judge Kristine G. Baker. Any party may file objections if they disagree with the findings or conclusions set out in the Recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection.

To be considered, objections must be filed within 14 days. If parties do not file objections, they risk waiving the right to appeal questions of fact. And, if no objections are filed, Judge Baker can adopt this Recommendation without independently reviewing the record.

II. Discussion

Mr. Dorn filed this lawsuit on December 22, 2020. (Doc. No. 1) He was ordered to submit a completed in forma pauperis (IFP) application or pay the filing fee within 30 days of December 29, 2020. (Doc. No. 2) To date, he has failed to comply with the Court's December 29 Order, and the time for complying has passed. The Court warned Mr. Dorn that his claims could be dismissed if he failed to comply with the Order.

III. Conclusion

The Court recommends that Mr. Dorn's claims be DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on his failure to comply with the Court's December 29, 2020 Order requiring him to address the filing fee requirement.


Summaries of

Dorn v. Doe

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 5, 2021
4:20-CV-1492-KGB-BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Dorn v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:REMANDO DORN Reg #14300-010 PLAINTIFF v. DOE DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 5, 2021

Citations

4:20-CV-1492-KGB-BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 5, 2021)