From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dormitory Auth. of State v. Lasker-Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1996
228 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 17, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In October 1984, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant Lasker-Goldman Corporation (hereinafter Lasker-Goldman) pursuant to which Lasker-Goldman agreed to perform general construction work at CUNY Law School in Flushing, New York. In connection with the contract, Lasker-Goldman, as principal, and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (hereinafter Aetna), as surety, executed a performance bond dated October 25, 1984. The terms of the performance bond required any action under the bond to be commenced before the expiration of two years from the date on which final payment was made under the contract. More than four years after the construction was allegedly completed, the plaintiff commenced this action against Lasker-Goldman and Aetna to recover damages for Lasker-Goldman's failure to perform all of its obligations under the contract. Aetna moved to dismiss the action insofar as asserted against it pursuant to CPLR 3211 on the ground that the action against it was time-barred by the terms of the performance bond. The Supreme Court denied the motion.

On appeal, Aetna contends that the final release signed by Lasker-Goldman, and its consent to final payment as surety, both of which were executed prior to the last payment made by the plaintiff under the terms of the contract, occurred more than two years before this suit was commenced. However, final acceptance of remaining work items never occurred, as certified by the plaintiff's execution of a notice of contract completion. In addition, the full amount of the last payment as requisitioned by Lasker-Goldman was never paid. Accordingly, the action insofar as asserted against Aetna was not time-barred by the terms of the performance bond (see, Ferran Concrete Co. v. Facilities Dev. Corp., 61 A.D.2d 1061; Tenalp Constr. Corp. v. County of Nassau, 88 A.D.2d 908).

Aetna's remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dormitory Auth. of State v. Lasker-Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1996
228 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Dormitory Auth. of State v. Lasker-Goldman

Case Details

Full title:DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LASKER-GOLDMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 532