From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doremus v. Auerbach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 28, 1918
120 N.E. 861 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued May 9, 1918

Decided May 28, 1918

Theodore H. Lord, John C. Robinson and Frederick Mellor for appellant.

Anthony M. Menkel and Henry S. Curtis for respondents Auerbach.

Clayton J. Heermance and Harold F. Klein for William L. Crow Construction Company, respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting as to defendants Auerbach: CHASE, HOGAN and CARDOZO, JJ.


Summaries of

Doremus v. Auerbach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 28, 1918
120 N.E. 861 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Doremus v. Auerbach

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO W. DOREMUS, as Administrator of the Estate of CHARLES A. SUTTON…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 28, 1918

Citations

120 N.E. 861 (N.Y. 1918)
120 N.E. 861

Citing Cases

Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Co., Inc.

Here, as in Murphy v. Altman ( 28 App. Div. 472), it was apparent to the plaintiff that the building was…

Sieger v. Crow Construction Co., Inc.

The trial court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory…