From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dor Motors Ltd. v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 1983
97 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

October 17, 1983


In an action for a judgment declaring that defendant is obligated to defend plaintiff in an action instituted by the third-party defendant Royal Globe Insurance Company (hereinafter Royal Globe) as subrogee of the third-party defendant Cleartone Reproductions Corp. (hereinafter Cleartone) and declaring that defendant is obligated to pay any judgment against plaintiff in that action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), dated June 23, 1982, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's complaint, and upon searching the record, dismissed its third-party action. Order modified by adding thereto a provision directing plaintiff to join Royal Globe as subrogee of Cleartone, as a party defendant. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Through the papers it submitted in opposition to the defendant's motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff established a triable issue of fact. Special Term, therefore, properly denied defendant's motion ( Glick Dolleck v Tri-Pac Export Corp., 22 N.Y.2d 439). In its third-party action, defendant sought neither indemnification nor contribution from the third-party defendants. Consequently, Special Term's dismissal of defendant's third-party complaint must be affirmed ( BRC Elec. Corp. v Cripps, 67 A.D.2d 899, 900; Buttermark v Raymond F. Korber, Inc., 65 A.D.2d 587, 588). Because Royal Globe will be affected by the judgment declaring the rights of the parties in this action and because it could challenge that determination in an action brought pursuant to section 167 (subd 1, par [b]) of the Insurance Law (see Steinbach v Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 81 A.D.2d 382, 387-388), it is a necessary party ( Manhattan Stor. Warehouse Co. v Movers Warehousemen's Assn., 289 N.Y. 82, 88). In its answer, the defendant raised the absence of "all necessary parties" as an affirmative defense (see CPLR 3211, subd [e]). Joinder of Royal Globe as subrogee of Cleartone is, therefore, appropriate. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dor Motors Ltd. v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 1983
97 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Dor Motors Ltd. v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance

Case Details

Full title:DOR MOTORS LTD., Respondent, v. GRAPHIC ARTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 17, 1983

Citations

97 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Newsom v. Republic Fin

(Cf. Dor Motors v Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co., 97 A.D.2d 455.) To the extent that a different conclusion is…

Galasso v. Liotti

Liotti, however, did not seek indemnification or contribution, and did not allege that Brewington was in any…