From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dooley v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 11, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-290 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-290

04-11-2013

RONALD A. DOOLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent Case)


ORDER

The undersigned hereby RECUSES himself from this consent case.

In a conference call held with counsel for both sides on April 9, 2013, during which counsel were told of the recusal, counsel for both sides advised the Court that they wish this case to remain a consent matter and seek to consent to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. The Court takes no position as to whether or not counsel should consent, and they were then so advised.

Pursuant to the request of counsel for both sides, this case, therefore, shall remain a consent matter before Magistrate Judge Merz, who shall have authority to enter final judgment in this matter. Appeal, if any, shall be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

This case, accordingly, is TRANSFERRED to Magistrate Judge Merz.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Dooley v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 11, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-290 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Dooley v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:RONALD A. DOOLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-290 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)