From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dooley v. Seaman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

October, 1916.


Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The jury was instructed, perhaps unnecessarily, that they must find an express contract. There was no evidence to prove such a contract. The verdict cannot stand. Jenks, P.J., Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Rich, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Dooley v. Seaman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Dooley v. Seaman

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOOLEY, Respondent, v. EDWARD A. SEAMAN, as Executor, etc., of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1916

Citations

175 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)