From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dontzin v. Digital Rain Partners I, L.L.C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 2002
295 A.D.2d 140 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1297N

June 6, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe III, J.), entered on or about December 13, 2001, which, inter alia, denied defendant Peter Allan's cross motion to change the venue of this action from New York County to either Bronx or Queens County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

DAVID A. FLEISSIG, for Plaintiffs-respondents.

NORMAN SOLOVAY, for Defendant-appellant.

Mazzarelli, J.P., Lerner, Rubin, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


The motion court exercised its discretion providently when it denied defendant's cross motion to change the venue of this action. Although plaintiff's father is a retired Supreme Court Justice who once presided in New York County, there was no demonstration that an impartial trial could not be obtained in that venue (see, Lombardoni v. Boccaccio, 160 A.D.2d 1089, 1091; cf., Kavelman v. Taylor, 245 A.D.2d 9; and cf.,Rothwax v. Spicehandler, 161 A.D.2d 184).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Dontzin v. Digital Rain Partners I, L.L.C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 2002
295 A.D.2d 140 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Dontzin v. Digital Rain Partners I, L.L.C

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW S. DONTZIN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. DIGITAL RAIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 6, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 140 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
742 N.Y.S.2d 832

Citing Cases

Ressler v. Friedman

Further, consolidation is warranted because this action and the Surrogate's Court proceeding have common…

In re Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig.

" In this respect, decedent functioned more like a member of the court staff rather than a sitting judge.…