From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Donahoe v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 27, 2019
581 S.W.3d 720 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 81910

08-27-2019

Jack DONAHOE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Julia E. Rives, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Julia E. Rives, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam:

Appellant Jack Donahoe ("Donahoe") appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Buchanan County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Donahoe pleaded guilty to one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062. Donahoe contends that the motion court erred in denying his motion without holding an evidentiary hearing because his motion alleged facts which, if true, showed that his guilty plea was involuntary. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Donahoe v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 27, 2019
581 S.W.3d 720 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Donahoe v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jack DONAHOE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 27, 2019

Citations

581 S.W.3d 720 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)