Opinion
2001-05484
Submitted January 30, 2002.
May 8, 2002.
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated January 23, 2001, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dillon, J.), dated November 19, 2001, which denied that branch of his motion which was to vacate his default in appearing at trial.
David H. Gendelman, New York, N.Y. (David M. Chidekel of counsel), for appellant.
Before: ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, KRAUSMAN, McGINITY, COZIER, JJ.
ORDERED that the notice of appeal from a decision dated March 29, 2001, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the order dated November 19, 2001; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Although the courts have adopted a liberal policy with respect to vacating defaults in matrimonial actions, the defaulting party is still required to show a reasonable excuse and a meritorious defense (see McGusty v. McGusty, 268 A.D.2d 508; Baumer v. Baumer, 268 A.D.2d 495). Here, the court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to vacate his default because he failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear at trial (see McGusty v. McGusty, supra; Sidi v. Sidi, 260 A.D.2d 566).
ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, KRAUSMAN, McGINITY and COZIER, JJ., concur.