From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dominick v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 8, 2024
21-cv-05545-RMI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2024)

Opinion

21-cv-05545-RMI

01-08-2024

LATONYA DOMINICK, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES RE: DKT. NOS. 28, 29

ROBERT M. ILLMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's fees under § 406(b) of the Social Security Act. Pl.'s Mot. (Dkt. 28). Defendant has filed a Response and does not oppose Plaintiff's motion. Def.'s Mot. (Dkt. 29). After reviewing the Plaintiff's Motion, the court finds the proposed fees in the amount of $8,792.67 are reasonable and allowable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A). The court previously awarded $7,800 in fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) (see dkt. 27), which has already been received by Plaintiff's counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for fees under § 406(b)(1) is GRANTED; the Commissioner is directed to certify payment in that amount to Plaintiff's counsel and Plaintiff's counsel is ORDERED to refund Plaintiff $7,800 upon receipt of that award. The fees awarded by this order shall be paid out of Plaintiff's past-due benefits in accordance with agency policy.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dominick v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 8, 2024
21-cv-05545-RMI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Dominick v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:LATONYA DOMINICK, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 8, 2024

Citations

21-cv-05545-RMI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2024)