From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dominguez v. Unemployment Appeals

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 2, 1996
679 So. 2d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-1199.

September 4, 1996. Rehearing Denied October 2, 1996.

Appeal from the Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Miguel R. Dominguez, in proper person.

John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Before JORGENSON, LEVY and FLETCHER, JJ.


Miguel R. Dominguez appeals a decision of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which adopted the findings of fact made by the unemployment compensation appeals referee, and which affirmed the referee's decision holding Dominguez disqualified from receiving benefits.

The referee's findings of fact (which we must accept as being based on substantial competent evidence in the absence of a transcript of the hearing) reveal that Dominguez was discharged by The Wackenhut Corporation for abandoning his post while his supervisor was in the process of giving him a written reprimand. The Commission's conclusion that Dominguez's behavior amounted to misconduct connected with work is within the Commission's area of expertise in the interpretation and application of its governing laws. It is thus entitled to our deference. See Public Employees Relations Comm'n v. Dade County Police Benevolent Ass'n, 467 So.2d 987 (Fla. 1985).

Accordingly, the Commission's decision is affirmed.


Summaries of

Dominguez v. Unemployment Appeals

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 2, 1996
679 So. 2d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Dominguez v. Unemployment Appeals

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL R. DOMINGUEZ, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 2, 1996

Citations

679 So. 2d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Risse v. Unemployment Appeals Comm

AFFIRMED. See Brooks v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 695 So.2d 879 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Dominguez v. Florida…

Martinson v. Breit's Tower Service

"[A] reviewing court must defer to an agency's interpretation of an operable statute as long as that…