Dominguez v. Bank of America, N.A.

Full title: Lilian Dominguez v. Bank of America, N.A., et al

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2015

CV 14-7489-GHK (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. May. 13, 2015)

Opinion

Lilian Dominguez v. Bank of America, N.A., et al No. CV 14-7489-GHK (FFMx) United States District Court, C.D. California May 13, 2015

          Presiding: The Honorable GEORGE H. KING, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

          Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Dismissing Case for Failure to Prosecute

          The Honorable GEORGE H. KING, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         On April 3, 2015, we dismissed Plaintiff Lilian Dominguez's (" Plaintiff") First Amended Complaint (" FAC") without prejudice, granting her thirty days to file a Second Amended Complaint (" SAC"). (Dkt. 47.) We warned Plaintiff that the failure to file an SAC would be deemed an admission that amendment is futile and that, in that event, this action would be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. More than thirty days have passed and no SAC has been filed. Accordingly, Plaintiff's failure to file an SAC is hereby deemed an admission that amendment of her FAC is futile. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Court's May 13, 2015 Order, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (" FAC") is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff shall take nothing by this FAC.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.