From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dominguez v. B S Supermarket, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 27, 2015
13-CV-7247 (RRM) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2015)

Summary

awarding prejudgment interest only on unpaid wages for which plaintiff was compensated under state law and not on damages awarded for defendants' failure to issue written notice of plaintiff's rate of pay in violation of NYLL § 195

Summary of this case from Demirovic v. Ortega

Opinion

13-CV-7247 (RRM) (CLP)

03-27-2015

PEDRO DOMINGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. B S SUPERMARKET, INC., EDDY L. FERNANDEZ, and JOHN DOE, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

By a motion filed May 13, 2014, plaintiff moved for a default judgment. On May 29, 2014, this Court referred the matter to the assigned Magistrate Judge, the Honorable Cheryl L. Pollak. Magistrate Judge Pollak held an inquest hearing on July 24, 2014, at which the defendants failed to appear. On March 5, 2015, Magistrate Judge Pollak issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that this Court (1) grant plaintiff's motion for default judgment; (2) award plaintiff $142,196.32 in damages, consisting of: $55,192.50 in unpaid overtime wages; $57,713.91 in liquidated damages; $2,500 for failure to provide statements required under the New York law; $11,433.50 in attorney's fees, $475.15 in costs; and $14,881.26 in prejudgment interest; (3) grant plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss the John Doe defendant from the action; and (4) order the defendants to pay plaintiff post-judgment interest, to be calculated from the date the Clerk of Court enters judgment in this action until the date of payment, using the federal rate set forth in 28 U.S.C § 1961.

Magistrate Judge Pollak reminded the parties that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any objections to the R&R were due within fourteen (14) days of its receipt. (Doc. No. 27 at 34.) Magistrate Judge Pollak directed the Clerk of Court to send copies of R&R to the parties "either electronically through the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system or by mail." (Id. at 35.) On March 6, 2015, the Clerk certified that a copy of the R&R had been mailed to Eddy L. Fernandez and B S Supermarket, d/b/a Clarimar Supermarket, at 4118 3rd Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11232. As of this date, no party has filed any objections.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error. Noting the thorough review that Magistrate Judge Pollak performed of plaintiff's claims and affidavits, her careful calculations of the damages to be awarded to plaintiff, and the inquest hearing that she held to assess damages, which prompted plaintiff to supplement his papers, the Court finds no clear error in the R&R. It concurs with and adopts Magistrate Judge Pollak's R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007).

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for default judgment is GRANTED, plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss the John Doe defendant from the action is GRANTED, and it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff be awarded a total of $142,196.32, consisting of: $55,192.50 in unpaid overtime wages; $57,713.91 in liquidated damages; $2,500 for failure to provide statements required under the New York law; $11,433.50 in attorney's fees, $475.15 in costs; and $14,881.26 in prejudgment interest; and that defendants B S Supermarket, Inc. and Eddy L. Fernandez pay post-judgment interest.

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment accordingly, transmit copies of this Order and the accompanying Judgment to each of the two defendants via U.S. Mail at the following address: B S Supermarket, d/b/a Clarimar Supermarket, 4118 3rd Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11232. The Clerk of Court is further directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York

March 27, 2015

Roslynn R. Mauskopf

ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dominguez v. B S Supermarket, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 27, 2015
13-CV-7247 (RRM) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2015)

awarding prejudgment interest only on unpaid wages for which plaintiff was compensated under state law and not on damages awarded for defendants' failure to issue written notice of plaintiff's rate of pay in violation of NYLL § 195

Summary of this case from Demirovic v. Ortega

applying an across-the-board reduction of 10% reduction

Summary of this case from Marshall v. Deutsche Post DHL
Case details for

Dominguez v. B S Supermarket, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO DOMINGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. B S SUPERMARKET, INC., EDDY L. FERNANDEZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 27, 2015

Citations

13-CV-7247 (RRM) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2015)

Citing Cases

Leevson v. Aqualife USA, Inc.

Defendants are correct that the 2011 amendment to the NYLL does not apply retroactively. SeeGold , 730 F.3d…

Saucedo v. On the Spot Audio Corp.

However, plaintiff is not entitled to prejudgment interest on amounts awarded under the Wage Theft Prevention…