From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dominguez v. 10 Roads Express, LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 25, 2024
24-cv-02409-RS (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-02409-RS

06-25-2024

DAVID JR. DOMINGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. 10 ROADS EXPRESS, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER VACATING HEARING AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

RICHARD SEEBORG, Chief United States District Judge.

This putative class action was removed to this court from Alameda County Superior Court. On May 23, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to remand. Any opposition to that motion was due no later than June 6, 2024. None has been filed.

Although the hearing was continued by Clerk's notice, Rule 7-7(d) of the Civil Local Rules expressly provides that “the continuance of the hearing of a motion does not extend the time for filing and serving the opposing papers.” Nevertheless, in light of the possibility that defendants believed their time to oppose remand had been extended, and the interest in resolving matters on the merits, defendants may file any opposition to remand (or a statement that they do not oppose remand) within one week of the date of this order, and plaintiff may reply within one week thereafter. The hearing set for July 18, 2024, is vacated. The matter will either be reset for hearing upon completion of the briefing, or decided without oral argument, in the Court's discretion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dominguez v. 10 Roads Express, LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 25, 2024
24-cv-02409-RS (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Dominguez v. 10 Roads Express, LLC

Case Details

Full title:DAVID JR. DOMINGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. 10 ROADS EXPRESS, LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 25, 2024

Citations

24-cv-02409-RS (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2024)