From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Domenikos v. Miranda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 23, 1998
255 A.D.2d 481 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 23, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that in order to vacate a judgment entered upon a party's default, the movant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse and meritorious defense to the action ( see, Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568; Fennell v. Mason, 204 A.D.2d 599; Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333). In this case, the affidavit which the defendant submitted in support of his motion failed to illustrate personal knowledge of evidentiary facts constituting a valid defense ( see, Fidelity Deposit Co. v Andersen Co., 60 N.Y.2d 693).

Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Domenikos v. Miranda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 23, 1998
255 A.D.2d 481 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Domenikos v. Miranda

Case Details

Full title:KOSTAS DOMENIKOS et al., Respondents, v. DAVID MIRANDA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 23, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 481 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 643

Citing Cases

Warren v. Allstate Insurance Company

We modify. A defendant seeking to vacate a default must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default…

Riley v. 543 E. 21st Ltd. Liab. Co.

In order to demonstrate a meritorious defense, a party must submit an affidavit from an individual with…