Opinion
Argued May 19, 1913
Decided June 3, 1913
Edgar T. Brackett for appellant.
William L. Visscher for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WILLARD BARTLETT, CHASE, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and MILLER, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Domenico v. the New York Central Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1913
102 N.E. 1104 (N.Y. 1913)
Summaries of
Domenico v. the New York Central Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1913
102 N.E. 1104 (N.Y. 1913)
Case details for
Domenico v. the New York Central Hudson River Rd. Co.
Case Details
Full title:AMELIA DI DOMENICO, as Administratrix of the Estate of SALVATORE DI…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 3, 1913
Citations
102 N.E. 1104 (N.Y. 1913)
102 N.E. 1104