From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dollar Trading Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Nov 3, 1972
468 F.2d 631 (C.C.P.A. 1972)

Summary

In Dollar Trading Corp., supra, the appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court holding that drills and rasps or files were more than rotary files or rasps, and therefore not subject to classification under an eo nomine designation providing for only one of their functions.

Summary of this case from Fedtro, Inc. v. United States, (1974)

Opinion

Customs Appeal No. 5497.

November 3, 1972.

Allerton deC. Tompkins, New York City, attorney of record, for appellant.

E. Grey Lewis, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew P. Vance, Chief, Customs Section, Marlene G. Sonderlick, New York City, for the United States.

Appeal from United States Customs Court, C.D. 4290.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges.


This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the Second Division of the United States Customs Court, overruling a protest concerning certain tools described in the invoice as "wood hole saws" and "metal hole saws."

67 Cust.Ct. 208, 349 F. Supp. 1395, C.D. 4290 (1971).

Upon careful consideration, we find that all of appellant's contentions before us were fully and correctly dealt with in the opinion of the Customs Court. Accordingly, we adopt that opinion as our own.

The judgment of the Customs Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dollar Trading Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Nov 3, 1972
468 F.2d 631 (C.C.P.A. 1972)

In Dollar Trading Corp., supra, the appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court holding that drills and rasps or files were more than rotary files or rasps, and therefore not subject to classification under an eo nomine designation providing for only one of their functions.

Summary of this case from Fedtro, Inc. v. United States, (1974)
Case details for

Dollar Trading Corp. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DOLLAR TRADING CORP., APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE

Court:United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Date published: Nov 3, 1972

Citations

468 F.2d 631 (C.C.P.A. 1972)
60 C.C.P.A. 10

Citing Cases

A.J. Arango, Inc. v. United States, (1981)

The so-called "separate and distinct" functions of the imported coupling, which plaintiff contends make it…

United States v. Oxford International Corp.

The clutching function was an addition to the function of the motor in supplying power. Dollar Trading Corp.…