Doll v. Kiser

Full title: Don DOLL and Karen Doll, Appellants, v. William C. KISER and Eileen…

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

383 S.W.3d 70 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 98000.

2012-10-23

Don DOLL and Karen Doll, Appellants, v. William C. KISER and Eileen Rodriguez–Kiser, Respondents.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, David Lee Vincent III, Judge. David S. Corwin, Michael J. Hart, Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Richard E. Coughlin, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, David Lee Vincent III, Judge.
David S. Corwin, Michael J. Hart, Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Richard E. Coughlin, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Don Doll and Karen Doll (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of William C. Kiser and Eileen Rodriguez–Kiser (“Defendants”) on Plaintiffs' petition to quiet title. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Plaintiffs' claims for prescriptive easement and trespass. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).