From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dolansky v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 28, 2021
320 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-1133

06-28-2021

Edward A. DOLANSKY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Edward A. Dolansky, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Edward A. Dolansky, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED as unauthorized. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that "[t]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850"); Mills v. Dugger , 574 So. 2d 63, 65 (Fla. 1990) ("As we have stated numerous times, habeas corpus is not to be used for obtaining additional appeals of issues which were raised, or should have been raised, on direct appeal or which were waived at trial or which could have, should have, or have been, raised in prior postconviction filings." (internal marks omitted)). The motion for extension of time is denied as moot.

Roberts, Rowe, and Jay, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dolansky v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 28, 2021
320 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Dolansky v. State

Case Details

Full title:Edward A. DOLANSKY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

320 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)