From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dokko v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Dec 28, 2021
No. 15739-21S (U.S.T.C. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

15739-21S

12-28-2021

Misun Dokko Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On October 25, 2021, respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that petitioner paid the tax liability for tax year 2019 before the issuance of the notice of deficiency, and, therefore, the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid. In his motion to dismiss, respondent states that petitioner does not object to the granting of the motion.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid.


Summaries of

Dokko v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Dec 28, 2021
No. 15739-21S (U.S.T.C. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Dokko v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Misun Dokko Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

No. 15739-21S (U.S.T.C. Dec. 28, 2021)