From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doering v. Ramires

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 10, 2024
CV 23-9222 PA (PDx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-9222 PA (PDx)

04-10-2024

Yuri Doering v. David Ramires, et al.

Kamilla Sali-Suleyman


Kamilla Sali-Suleyman

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re; Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before April 15, 2024, why Defendant Bernard M. Smukler should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Doering v. Ramires

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 10, 2024
CV 23-9222 PA (PDx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Doering v. Ramires

Case Details

Full title:Yuri Doering v. David Ramires, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 10, 2024

Citations

CV 23-9222 PA (PDx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2024)