From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Wrenn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Apr 9, 2015
Civil No. 14-cv-433-LM (D.N.H. Apr. 9, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 14-cv-433-LM

04-09-2015

John Does #1-#5 v. William L. Wrenn, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections

cc: Michael T. Hanson, pro se


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 3, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff Michael Hanson to pay the filing fee or apply for in forma pauperis status, and gave him sixty days to comply. See Doc. No. 12 (Order). Hanson has done nothing to comply with the February 3, 2015, Order (doc. no. 12). Accordingly, the case should be dismissed without prejudice because of Hanson's failure to pay the filing fee or apply for in forma pauperis status as directed.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the case should be dismissed, without prejudice. Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court's order. See United States v. De Jesús-Viera, 655 F.3d 52, 57 (1st Cir. 2011); Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010).

/s/_________

Andrea K. Johnstone

United States Magistrate Judge
April 9, 2015 cc: Michael T. Hanson, pro se


Summaries of

Doe v. Wrenn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Apr 9, 2015
Civil No. 14-cv-433-LM (D.N.H. Apr. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Doe v. Wrenn

Case Details

Full title:John Does #1-#5 v. William L. Wrenn, Commissioner, New Hampshire…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Apr 9, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 14-cv-433-LM (D.N.H. Apr. 9, 2015)