From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Steele

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Aug 30, 2021
20cv1818-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)

Opinion

20cv1818-MMA (MSB)

08-30-2021

JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. CISSY STEELE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC DISCOVERY CONFERENCE

Honorable Michael S. Berg, United States Magistrate Judge.

On August 27, 2021, the parties filed a “Joint Statement Regarding Stipulated Protective Order, ” in which they asked the Court for “a brief telephonic conference” to resolve an issue regarding how the parties' stipulated protective order “relates to the disclosure of Plaintiff's name in performing third party discovery and investigation.” (ECF No. 67 at 2.) Pursuant to this request, the Court SETS a telephonic Discovery Conference for September 3, 2021 , at 11:00 a.m. Counsel for Plaintiff is ORDERED to arrange the joint call to chambers at (619) 557-6632.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Doe v. Steele

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Aug 30, 2021
20cv1818-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Doe v. Steele

Case Details

Full title:JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. CISSY STEELE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Aug 30, 2021

Citations

20cv1818-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)