Opinion
20-5297
02-14-2023
JOHN DOE, M.D., PH.D., APPELLANT v. JUDITH RODGERS, M.H.A. AS SENIOR ADVISOR IN DIVISION OF PRACTITIONER DATA BANKS, ET AL., JOHN DOE, M.D., PH.D., P.L.L.C., APPELLEE
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:12-cv-01229)
Before: HENDERSON and RAO, Circuit Judges, and RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge.
JUDGMENT
The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. CIR. R. 36(d). It is:
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinions signed on June 17, 2015, and September 10, 2020.
The Clerk will withhold the mandate until seven days after any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc is resolved. See FED. R. APP. P. 41(b); D.C. CIR. R. 41(a)(1).