From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dodson v. Fedex Corporate Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 6, 2015
Case No. CV 14-3733-JFW (AGRx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2015)

Summary

concluding that plaintiff's claim of harassment on the basis of age lacked merit because comments at issue were "facially neutral and do not suggest or evidence the existence of any age-based harassment."

Summary of this case from White v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-3733-JFW (AGRx)

04-06-2015

Lee Dodson, Plaintiff, v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

The Court, having granted the Defendant FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.'s (sued as FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. and FedEx Corporate Services) ("Defendant") motion for summary judgment based on its determination that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all claims for relief alleged against it,

IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that judgment is entered in this action as follows:

1. Plaintiff Lee Dodson ("Plaintiff") shall recover nothing from Defendant;

2. Defendant shall have judgment in its favor on Plaintiff's entire action; and

3. Defendant shall recover from Plaintiff its costs of suit in the sum of $ __________.

The Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment. Dated: April 6, 2015

/s/_________

JOHN F. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dodson v. Fedex Corporate Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 6, 2015
Case No. CV 14-3733-JFW (AGRx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2015)

concluding that plaintiff's claim of harassment on the basis of age lacked merit because comments at issue were "facially neutral and do not suggest or evidence the existence of any age-based harassment."

Summary of this case from White v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
Case details for

Dodson v. Fedex Corporate Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Lee Dodson, Plaintiff, v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 6, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 14-3733-JFW (AGRx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2015)

Citing Cases

White v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.

Because White premises harassment on his membership in a protected age category, he must show that the…

Tomasini v. United States Postal Serv.

See e.g. Youngs v. Meridian Pointe, 2010 WL 3937382, *3 (M.D. Fl. Oct. 6, 2010) (“the facially-neutral…