From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dodson v. CSK Auto, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 18, 2013
2:13-cv-00346-GEB-AC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)

Opinion

2:13-cv-00346-GEB-AC

04-18-2013

ROBERT DODSON, Plaintiff, v. CSK AUTO, INC. dba O'REILLY AUTO PARTS #3506; BLOOM INVESTMENT COMPANY, a CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, Defendants.


ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P.

4(M) NOTICE

Plaintiff's Status Report filed April 15, 2013, reveals this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on April 29, 2013, is continued to August 5, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference.

Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendants with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may result in the unserved defendant(s) and/or the action being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or before June 24, 2013, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for each defendant or a sufficient explanation why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)'s prescribed service period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dodson v. CSK Auto, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 18, 2013
2:13-cv-00346-GEB-AC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Dodson v. CSK Auto, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT DODSON, Plaintiff, v. CSK AUTO, INC. dba O'REILLY AUTO PARTS #3506…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-00346-GEB-AC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)