From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DODD v. FLA. PAROLE PROBATION COMM

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 3, 1980
380 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. SS-236.

March 3, 1980.

Hurshel Ross Dodd, petitioner, pro se.


This cause is before us upon an amended petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner alleges that the method by which his presumptive parole release date was determined treats his concurrent sentences as if they were consecutive sentences.

Section 947.173, Fla. Stat., provides for administrative review, upon request, of presumptive parole release date determinations. However, it is not alleged that such review was ever requested as to the issue now presented. Petitioner's apparent failure to avail himself of this administrative remedy precludes mandamus relief. See State ex rel. Boulevard Mortgage Co. v. Thompson, 113 Fla. 419, 151 So. 704 (1933).

Accordingly, the petition is denied.

MILLS, C.J., and LARRY G. SMITH, and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DODD v. FLA. PAROLE PROBATION COMM

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 3, 1980
380 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

DODD v. FLA. PAROLE PROBATION COMM

Case Details

Full title:HURSHEL ROSS DODD, PETITIONER, v. FLORIDA PAROLE PROBATION COMMISSION ET…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 3, 1980

Citations

380 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Boone v. Fla. Comm'n on Offender Review

He is thus prohibited from raising it here. See Riddell v. Fla. Dep't of Corrections, 538 So.2d 132, 133…

Riddell v. Florida Dept. of Corr

Riddell's October 27, 1987 petition for writ of mandamus, however, abandoned all three of those points and…