From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bias v. Vannoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
May 23, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-1016 SECTION P (W.D. La. May. 23, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-1016 SECTION P

05-23-2018

DAVID DIANTE BIAS LA. DOC #476635 v. DARRELL VANNOY


MAGISTRATE WHITEHURST

JUDGMENT

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Carol B. Whitehurst for report and recommendation. For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, consistent with the report and recommendation.

Monroe, Louisiana, this 23rd day of May, 2018.

/s/ _________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bias v. Vannoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
May 23, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-1016 SECTION P (W.D. La. May. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Bias v. Vannoy

Case Details

Full title:DAVID DIANTE BIAS LA. DOC #476635 v. DARRELL VANNOY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: May 23, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-1016 SECTION P (W.D. La. May. 23, 2018)