From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fruge v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Mar 4, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0153 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 4, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0153 SECTION P

03-04-2015

ZENAS FRUGE LA. DOC #438045 v. LARRY COX, ET AL.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections and responses thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 25], is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. Nos. 1, 8] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 4th day of March, 2015.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fruge v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Mar 4, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0153 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Fruge v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:ZENAS FRUGE LA. DOC #438045 v. LARRY COX, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0153 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 4, 2015)

Citing Cases

Tillis v. Mgmt. & Training Corp.

In this case, Defendants' "uncontested, competent summary judgment evidence establishes beyond peradventure"…

Taylor v. Hollins

In this case, Defendants' "uncontested, competent summary judgment evidence establishes beyond peradventure"…