From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DOAN v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 4, 2004
No. 03-03-00548-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 4, 2004)

Opinion

No. 03-03-00548-CR.

Filed: March 4, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the District Court of Tom Green County, 119th Judicial District, No. B-03-0150-S, Honorable Barbara Ann L. Walther, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

Before Justices KIDD, B.A. SMITH and PEMBERTON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant Bradley Doan pleaded guilty to an indictment accusing him of sexual assault. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.011 (West Supp. 2004). The district court adjudged him guilty and imposed a fifteen-year prison sentence. Doan's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to Doan, who was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

DOAN v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 4, 2004
No. 03-03-00548-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 4, 2004)
Case details for

DOAN v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY DOAN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Mar 4, 2004

Citations

No. 03-03-00548-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 4, 2004)