From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D.N.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 9, 2000
772 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D98-3858

Opinion filed August 9, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


D.N.S. pleaded no contest to violating the City of Tampa's juvenile curfew ordinance, reserving her right to appeal the denial of her dispositive motion to dismiss on the ground that the ordinance is unconstitutional. We affirm on the authority of our recent decisions in J.P. v. State, No. 2D97-1736 (Fla. 2d DCA June 23, 2000), involving the Tampa ordinance at issue in this case, and State v. T.M., 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1211 (Fla. 2d DCA May 17, 2000), involving a similar ordinance enacted by the City of Pinellas Park. We certify the following questions of great public importance:

AT WHAT LEVEL OF SCRUTINY MUST A COURT EXAMINE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE? IS THE TAMPA JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE CONSTITUTIONAL?

Affirmed.

SALCINES, J., Concurs.

BLUE, A.C.J., Concurs specially.

NORTHCUTT, J., Dissents with opinion.


I concur because I am bound by this court's decision in T.M. In the absence of this precedent, however, I would agree with Judge Northcutt's analysis of the issues. See T.M. (Northcutt, J., dissenting).


I respectfully dissent. See State v. T.M., 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1211 (Fla. 2d DCA May 17, 2000) (Northcutt, J., dissenting).


Summaries of

D.N.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 9, 2000
772 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

D.N.S. v. State

Case Details

Full title:D.N.S., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 9, 2000

Citations

772 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

D.N.S. v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review D.N.S. v. State, 772 So.2d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), in which the Second District…

D.N.S. v. State

This court previously rejected her argument and affirmed the trial court's determination that the ordinance…