From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DMF, Inc. v. Amp Plus, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 2, 2024
2:18-cv-07090-CAS (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2:18-cv-07090-CAS (GJSx)

01-02-2024

DMF, Inc., Plaintiff, v. AMP Plus, Inc. d/b/a/ ELCO Lighting, et al., Defendants.


INTERIM JUDGMENT REGARDING WILLFULNESS

Hon. Christina A. Snyder, United States District Judge

Following a bench trial concerning willfulness, wherein the Court assumed infringement and validity of U.S. Patent No. 9,964,266 per stipulation of the parties, the Court entered its Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law that Plaintiff DMF, Inc. did not carry its burden to prove willfulness. Accordingly, on the factual issue of willfulness, the Court enters Judgment in favor of Defendants AMP Plus, Inc. d/b/a ELCO LIGHTING and ELCO Lighting, Inc. Upon entry of this interim Judgment, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(b) shall apply to the Court's findings as to willfulness. However, because the patent infringement claim to which the willfulness findings relate has not been finally adjudicated, the judgment as to willfulness shall not be deemed a final judgment from which a partial appeal could be taken under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).


Summaries of

DMF, Inc. v. Amp Plus, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 2, 2024
2:18-cv-07090-CAS (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

DMF, Inc. v. Amp Plus, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DMF, Inc., Plaintiff, v. AMP Plus, Inc. d/b/a/ ELCO Lighting, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

2:18-cv-07090-CAS (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)